Linda Sarsour Is The Most Dangerous Woman In The USA
What are your thoughts on Linda Sarsour?
Why has the left embraced her?
Linda Sarsour is the most dangerous woman in the USA. True or false?
Check out my video response below:
The Old Simo YouTube video library can be found here
Linda Sarsour is the most dangerous woman in the USA . I can say this without hesitation and with a solid case. Sarsour is a Muslim Palestinian Arab who founded the Arab American Association of New York. She was born and raised in Brooklyn.
She fancies herself as a progressive, as well as a feminist and human rights activist. Sarsour recently caused controversy with a speech she gave at an ISNA seminar.
She was accused by media outlets of enticing violent Jihad towards the US administration. Watching the full speech revealed that she had quoted a non violent Jihad passage from the Hadith. It stated that the best form of Jihad is to face your oppressor with words of truth. Ok, we will let that one slide.
You may ask why Linda Sarsour is the most dangerous woman in the USA. There are plenty of strong factors that confirm this. What makes her especially deadly is her ability to con the new wave leftists into believing that she’s a paragon of feminism and human rights advocacy. Sarsour is heavily involved in the Women’s March Organization. Somehow, during a march she was able to get white Western women to put on Hijabs and wail “Alhuah Akbhar”. I almost fell off my chair watching that.
I came to the conclusion that the far left has embraced her due to intersectionality. Intersectionality is the process of existing within a hybrid of categories that are considered minority or disadvantageous. Muslim, woman, and Arab. Three perceived categories of victimhood by myopic western lenses. That’s three big ticks.
Intersectionality has become a form of victimhood Olympics. A masochistic competition of who can suffer more. Hence Sarsour is embraced upon her intersectionality, rather that who she really is. They don’t examine the interiors.
Reasons Why Linda Sarsour Is The Most Dangerous Woman In The USA
She is constantly invoking the name of Allah in her speeches. She has an uncritical, obsessesive enthusiasm for Islam. “Our top priority is to please Allah and only Allah” Sarsour says. This is an obvious inclination to religious fanaticism. However, she is rarely called on it. If she was a Christian invoking the name of God, the collective would have already deemed her to be a religious fanatic.
Sarsour is a classic Sharia advocate. She willfully lies about what Sharia is. Sarsour uses the standard technique of pulling out the non problematic requirements and claiming “that’s all Sharia is”. She deliberately neglects to admit or mention that there are at least 30 Sharia law requirements that come from the Qaran and the Hadith that violate human rights on a daily basis globally. How can she claim to be a human rights activist ?
Sarsour seems to like the idea of Islamisation of the USA. This would mean a political Islamic theocratic system in replacement of a secular democracy. Sarsour has never said anything to denounce this suggestion. She has dropped a number of tweets highlighting the one beneficial element of living under Sharia Law: No interest on loans. What a perfect way to entice morons into believing that it’s a reasonable option.
She has consistently lied about the life and times of Mohammed. Sarsour has referred to him as a racial justice warrior, a human rights activist, an environmental and animal rights activist, and a feminist. Talk about denial and religious fanaticism !
This is critical because the words of Mohammed play a big part in Islam, in particular the construction of Sharia law. Mohammed was a peaceful man in his first 12 years in Mecca. However, the majority of life spent in Medina, and afterwards, he was a violent pedophilic autocrat. He spread his message via force. Linda likes to ignore these important details.
Feminism and Human Rights Advocacy
Sarsour once said “you can’t be a feminist and support the state of Israel “. Really? What has Israel done to women? Muslim majority nations have done far more to abuse women’s rights. How can she claim to be a feminist and human rights activist when she’s a Islamist and Sharia law advocate? Furthermore, how can she claim to be a feminist when she’s advocated for the beating and genital mutilation of Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Brigitte Gabriel?
Sarsour endorses ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) which has ties to the very dubious Muslim Brotherhood. They are suspected and connected to a number of global terrorist attacks.
She praises Dr Sayyid Syeed. He’s the founder of ISNA. He’s been involved in a number of organizations which have been identified as Muslim Brotherhood organizations or fronts.
Sarsour claims Sirraj Wahhaj as her mentor. Wahhaj had a role in the unindicted conspiracy to blow up the World Trade Centre in 1993. He has also raised funds for groups responsible for funding Al Qaeda.
She has told Muslim Americans that it’s not necessary for them to assimilate.
She is into false equivocations. She’s stated that the white house administration is full of fascists and white supremacists. Linda often enjoys using these terms at anyone who disagrees with her.
Anyone who uses the term “Islamophobia” loses credibility. This would mean that Sarsour has no credibility. She uses this illegitimate term as it was designed for. It’s aim to shut down critical thought aimed at Islam. She throws it at anyone who dares to criticize her religion.
Linda’s surname translates to cockroach in Arabic. What a fitting name to bestow on such a problematic person.
I’ve never understood why the Women’s March Organization and their followers have never embraced Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Shouldn’t a real feminist and human right’s activist be a centerpiece of their movement?
The former Obama administration credited Linda Sarsour as a beacon of positive change and influence. This is when you know that we are in deep trouble.